OTAs are voluntary, so Mathis is not required to attend. The mandatory minicamp from June 16-18 is a better date to gauge. No word yet on Mathis.

The first OTA is today. I get to watch for the first time on Thursday. What I've heard on Bradford is that he's throwing, but he's still rehabbing. I'll obviously know more on Thursday when I can see practice with my own eyes.

I don't think he'll be WR4, Joe. They certainly don't pay him to be a WR4. I don't think Cooper's playing time is changed much from last year. But Matthews, Agholor, and Huff will all play. You'll see a lot of mixing and matching.

A top 10? That's a hard list to crack. Rodgers, Brady, Manning, Brees, Luck, Wilson, Ryan, Rivers, Roethlisberger, Newton. That's 10 right there, and doesn't even get into Romo, Stafford, Eli, Kaepernick, Flacco. So I wouldn't say top 10. But he has talent to be a really good QB.

I think it's a potential role -- if Tebow lines up in the shotgun with Murray on a two-point conversion, then there are some interesting possibilities. But Tebow needs to make the team as a QB first. A lot depends on how he passes.

I never minded them. It was a worthwhile discussion. But I'm excited that we're closer to actual on-field activity and answering those questions.

1) QBs; 2) Safety spot next to Malcolm Jenkins; 3) Health of players returning from injuries; 4) How Agholor looks; 5) How Marcus Smith looks.

Valid questions. He's entering his third year and has every opportunity to enter the lineup. The coaches didn't think he looked right last year, which is why Wolff went on IR. If he's fully healthy, he'll be a better player than how he appeared last year. Or at least that's what they hope. But he must prove he is healthy and can stay healthy.

Hard for me to answer because I've never seen Mudiay other than highlight clips. I'd caution anyone from evaluating a player based on highlight clips. Russell has the chance be a very productive player. I'm intrigued by what I've heard about Mudiay, but I'd need to defer to the people who've seen him. But I don't think you can go wrong with Russell.

Well, Tebow transcends football fans and commands a lot of attention. But he'll be a No. 3 QB if he's on the team. Bradford has the chance to be a starting QB on a contender. Bradford should be the more interesting story, but Tebow is obviously big story.

I think they need to hope for health. Many teams can say that, but I don't think the Eagles have enough depth this season to withstand injuries at that spot. I thought they'd try to upgrade some of the backup spots, but they're relying on player development. They let a starter leave and didn't add a starting-caliber player to the mix. Long-term, I think it's more of a concern than short term. If they stay healthy this year, they'll be fine.

Earl Wolff, because I think they're committed to playing Rowe at corner -- as of now, at least.

If you're going to buy one, I'd say Jason Kelce, Lane Johnson, Fletcher Cox are players I can see being here for a long time.

For the first few periods.

If Bradford is healthy, then yes. It really comes back to the QB.

I don't know what you mean by "whining." The depth was an issue last year, and they didn't do anything to upgrade it. I agree on the top-end talent, which is why I said they're fine if they're healthy.

My guess is Alonso stays on the inside.

Eagles always draw interest, but Tebow can generate some non-football attention.

It's hard to find good QBs. If Bradford proves he can be one, then the Eagles need to treat him as such. Injury is risk that must be taken into account, but the upside would also be enticing.

This year, no -- not a big concern, as long as Barbre is fine at RG. Long-term, it's more of a concern.

As a very good No. 2 RB who can be a decent starter if Murray goes down.

LeSean McCoy. But Murray will still be productive.